Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 F.3d 655

Docket No. 95-6228.

Clarence Garfield Buffalo v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. Decided Aug. 23, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-23

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Robert Lee Barham v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-23

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clarence Garfield Buffalo, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Buffalo v. Virginia, No. CA-94-73-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 27, 1994; Dec. 23, 1994; Jan. 10, 1995; Jan. 24, 1995). In light of this dismissal, Appellant's motion to expedite his appeal is moot and is, therefore, denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/64/f3d/655 · .json · Public domain