Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 F.3d 659

Docket No. 95-6650.

Tabon v. Anderson

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-17

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Reiff v. Sullivan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2014

2 district ·

70199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David E. Tabon, appellant pro se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tabon v. Anderson, No. CA-94-604-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/64/f3d/659 · .json · Public domain