Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 F.3d 659

Docket No. 95-6875.

Tucker v. Fox

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 25, 1995. Decided: August 15, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Relies on Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Evans v. Croom

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-15

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., appellant pro se.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/64/f3d/659 · .json · Public domain