Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 F.3d 660

Docket No. 95-6658.

United States v. Gordon

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 25, 1995. Decided Aug. 14, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-14

Relies on United States v. Horvwalt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-14

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Evans Lee Gordon, appellant pro se. John Granville Douglass, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for modification of his sentence based upon amendments to the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual Sec. 3E1.1 (Nov.1992). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gordon, No. CR89-75 (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/64/f3d/660 · .json · Public domain