Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 F.3d 660

Docket No. 95-6135.

United States v. Hendricks

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-08-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Horvwalt

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-08-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Hubert Hendricks, appellant pro se.

Laura Marie Everhart, Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hendricks, Nos. CR-92-163-N; CA-94-1186-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/64/f3d/660 · .json · Public domain