64 F3d 661 Watson v. T Dixon
64 F.3d 661
Henry WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; Robert Newton; Doctor Whitehurst; Deborah
Adles, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6871.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 22, 1995.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry Watson, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, LaVee Hamer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watson v. Dixon, No. CA-93-67-CRT-BR (E.D.N.C. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED