¶1 Robert Hayes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Polotsky, No. CA-03-983-AMD (D. Md. filed Apr. 14, 2003; entered Apr. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
64 F. App'x 412
Hayes v. Polotsky
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided June 3, 2003
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-06-03
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2003
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-06-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →