Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 FLA 154 - Thorp v. Smith

Thorp v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2000

14 state decisions

401912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Bailey · Rouse v. State · Cool v. Commonwealth · Whatley v. State · Alexander v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here time is material, it must be proved as alleged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.