Lumpkin v. Meskill’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2004
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2281
Relies on Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. · United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United States · 110 F. Supp. 295 - United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. · White v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in keeping with a basic principle of the discovery rules that a reasonable burden may be imposed on the parties when its discharge will facilitate preparation for trial and ease the trial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.