Friedman v. Wheat First Securities Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · Reichelt v. Gates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is evident that the equitable tolling doctrine is fundamentally inconsistent with the 1- and S-year structure. The 1-year period, by its terms, begins after discovery of the facts constituting the violation, making tolling unnecessary. The 3-year limit is a period of repose inconsistent with tolling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.