64 F. Supp. 2d 519 - Murphy v. Danzig’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari · Page v. Bolger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mere offensive utterance that occurred once and did not unreasonably interfere with [the plaintiff's] ability to work”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Mustafa v. Iancu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.