Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 FSUPP2D 599 - Peck v. Merletti

Peck v. Merletti’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
July 2007
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Coleman v. Peyton · Bolding v. Holshouser · United States v. Kaun

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. Finally, where a defendant challenges a pro se plaintiff's complaint on a 12(b)(6) motion, as is the case here, a court should permit the claim to proceed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.