Moskowitz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1865
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Teague v. Lane · United State v. Morgan · Jencks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not a substitute for appeal, and ... is strictly limited to those cases in which errors of the most fundamental character have rendered the proceeding itself irregular and invalid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A coram nobis petition is a collateral proceeding through which a court may correct fundamental errors in a prior final judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.