Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Haw. 229 - State v. Doyle

State v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2019

12 state decisions

401981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Thompson · Evalt v. United States · State v. Texeira · 228 F. Supp. 994 - United States v. Mihalopoulos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion made before trial shall be determined before trial unless the court orders that it be deferred for determination at the trial of the general issue or until after verdict; provided that a motion to suppress made before trial shall be determined before trial. Where factual issues are involved in determining a motion, the court shall state its essential findings on the records.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a motion to suppress made before trial shall be determined before trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]here the trial court at a bench trial expressly advises the parties, for the record, of its intention to hear the motion and the merits contemporaneously and no objection is voiced by either party to the proposed procedure, the trial court may then proceed to hear the issues contemporaneously. The trial court should, however, enter its ruling on the motion to suppress before finally determining the merits of the charge against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.