Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Ill. 2d 123 - People v. Bean

64 Ill. 2d 123 - People v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably 76 Ill. 2d 274 - People v. Preston (1979), 108 Ill. 2d 301 - People Ex Rel. Daley v. Crilly (1985)

29 state decisions

180197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 44 Ill. 2d 244 - The People v. Nilsson · The People v. Defrates · United States v. Medansky · 23 Ill. 2d 520 - The PEOPLE v. Mays · 26 Ill. App. 3d 1090 - People v. Bean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is apparent the court acted rather hastily but we hardly see how the record justifies the assertion that the trial court abused its discretion in the premises, nothing appearing to show such abuse. A court of review will not presume an abuse of discretion. It has long been recognized by this court and elsewhere that a court of justice is invested with the authority to discharge a jury from giving any verdict whenever, in the; court’s opinion, there is manifest necessity for such act or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated, and that such is within the discretion of the trial court and is not subject to review in the absence of abuse of discretion. [Citations.]””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 52 Ill. App. 3d 178 - People v. Partee · 112 Ill. App. 3d 1061 - People v. Kettler

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.