State v. Hickox’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 1933
most recently cited
2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Robbins v. Taxing District of Shelby Co Tennessee · Leisy v. Hardin · Bowman v. Chicago N W Ry Co · Sherlock v. Alling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any person who shall take or receive any order for intoxicating liquors from any person in this state,, other than a person authorized to sell the same as in this act provided, or any person who shall directly or indirectly contract for the sale of intoxicating liquors-with any person in this state, other than a person authorized to sell the same, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished therefor as provided in this act for selling intoxicating liquors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crigler v. Shepler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.