Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 KAN 878 - Farmer v. Warner

Farmer v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2015

4 state decisions

20190219101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not agree with this contention. Statutory provisions requiring security for costs are for the protection of the officers of the court and witnesses. While compliance with the mandatory provisions of such statutes will be enforced, if called to the attention of the court by «motion or otherwise, the failure to enforce such provisions by the court does not deprive it of jurisdiction or rended its judgments a nullity.” (p„ 879.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.