Akinci-Unal v. Unal’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co. · "Automatic" Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Seneca Foods Corp. · Heacock v. Heacock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a cause of action in law or equity arising from the person’s ...(g) maintaining a domicile in this commonwealth while a party to a personal or marital relationship out of which arises a claim for divorce, alimony, property settlement, parentage of a child, child support or child custody; or the commission of any act giving rise to such a claim.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cherin v. Cherin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.