Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 ME 140 - Sanborn v. Kimball

Sanborn v. Kimball’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
23
states following
January 1998
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 1998 · most notably Wall (1882), State v. Peck (1914)

34 state decisions — followed in 23 states

801875188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An attorney at law is an officer of the court as appears from the terms of his oath of office, to wit: ‘you will conduct yourself in the office of an attorney within the courts according to the best of your knowledge and discretion, and with all good fidelity, as well to the courts as your clients.’ The order of his admission to the bar is the judgment of the court that he possesses the requisite legal qualifications and good moral character to entitle him to practice the profession of an attorney at law. From the moment of his entrance upon the duties of his office, he becomes responsible to the court for his official misconduct. The tenure of his office is during good behavior, and he can only be deprived of it for misconduct ascertained and determined by the court after opportunity to be heard has been afforded. In the absence of specific provision to the contrary the power of removal is commensurate with the power of appointment. Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall., 378 ; case of Austin et als., 5 Rawle, 203 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.