Lea v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2005
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte Phillips · Murphy v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no merit in the objection made to the indictment that it is double, because it alleges in the same count that both vinous and spirituous liquors were sold. The selling of one or both, as charged, was criminal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Schmitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.