Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 MONT 481 - State v. Reagin

State v. Reagin’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 1978

2 district · 14 state decisions

80192219301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Howard · State v. Calder · Territory of Montana v. McAndrews · People v. Bostic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] party cannot suggest an imaginary state of facts, and then demand that the court instruct the jury as to the law applicable to such imaginings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.