¶1 The question is, whether a Clerk of a Court and his sureties, are liable upon his official bond, for the failure of the Clerk to issue ex officio, a notice to a guardian to renew his bond. This question was before this Court in State ex rel. Lee v. Watson, 7 Ire. 289, and again in State ex rel. Jones v. Biggs, 1 Jon. 364.
¶2 In the first case, it was decided by a divided Court, that he was; and in the last case, by a divided Court, that he was not liable.
¶3 It was supposed by the plaintiff’s counsel, that these conflicting decisions left it an open question, and he insisted that the first decision is the better law. We have considered it as an open question, and were attentive to Mr. G-orrell’s learned argument, but we adhere to the decision that the Clerk and his sureties are not liable. The question was so fully discussed and considered in the cases referred to, that it would be superfluous to repeat the discussion here.
¶4 There is no error.
¶5 Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
¶6 Note. — The case of W. A. Myers and wife, against the same defendants, received a similar determination at this Term.