Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 N.C. 607

State v. . McIntosh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1870

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1870-06-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1853

1 state decisions

Relies on Benbow v. . Robbins . · State v. Liles · State v. Ballard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1870-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Upon the trial of the issues, the defendant tendered himself as a witness, but his Honor excluded him, as incompetent. The defendant excepted.

¶2Verdict, Guilty; Judgment accordingly, and Appeal by the defendant. A proceeding in bastardy, is a civil action, as distinguished from a criminal action: Const. Art. IV, § 1.

¶3Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a civil action proper. In such special proceeding a party may be examined as a witness in his own behalf: C.C.P. §§ 342-3;State v. Waldrop, 63 N.C. 507; State v. Pate, 44 N.C. 244.

¶4There was error in the ruling of his Honor, and there must be a venirede novo upon the issue submitted.

¶5Let this be certified.

¶6Per curiam.

¶7Venire de novo.

¶8Cited: S. v. Hickerson, 72 N.C. 422; S. v. Crouse, 86 N.C. 619; S. v.Ballard, 122 N.C. 1028; S. v. Liles, 134 N.C. 737. *473

¶9(608)

/64/nc/607 · .json · Public domain