64 N.C. App. 256 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2016
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York · Elkins v. United States · Steagald v. United States · Finch v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need not consider whether [the officer] was in 'hot pursuit' and whether that alone was sufficient to justify his entry into [the] defendant's home. The need for a search warrant should have been anticipated in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n so doing, the State seeks to focus [the Court's] attention on events that occurred after the point in time when a judgment as to whether a search warrant was required should already have been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no exigent circumstances existed that would justify the warrantless entry into [the] defendant's house and the later seizure of the evidence which [the] defendant seeks to suppress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.