64 N.C. App. 536 - State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2019
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bailey · State v. Strickland · State v. Brock · 27 N.C. App. 354 - State v. Kearns · State v. Vehaun
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]uress must be present, imminent or impending, and of such a nature as to induce a well-grounded apprehension of death or serious bodily harm if the act is not done.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the trial judge had no duty to instruct the jury on duress or coercion as a justification for his participation in the crime, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of his counsel who failed to request such an instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitmore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.