Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 N.E.3d 837

In re Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2016

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2016-12-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LORETTA H. RUSH, Chief Justice.

¶1The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(ll.l)(a), has filed a “Notice of Guilty Finding and Request for Suspension,” requesting that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this State, pending further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, due to Respondent being found guilty of a crime punishable as a felony.

¶2The Court, being duly advised and upon consideration of all materials submitted, now finds that Respondent has been found guilty of the following offense under Indiana law: Intimidation, a level 6 felony.

¶3IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately. Respondent is already under suspension for continuing legal education noncompliance and dues nonpayment. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the continuing duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). The interim suspension shall continue until further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, provided no other suspension is in effect.

All Justices concur.
/64/ne3d/837 · .json · Public domain