Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 N.M. 168 - State v. Baize

State v. Baize’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1984

13 state decisions

801958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Compton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have held time and again a defendant must call the attention of a trial court to any claimed error in the instructions by appropriate objection before he may obtain a reversal on account of such error.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.