London v. Bruskas’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Martinez v. Research Park, Inc. (1965), Bank of New Mexico v. Rice (1967)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State Trust & Savings Bank v. Hermosa Land & Cattle Co. · Kutz Canon Oil & Gas Co. v. Harr · Prescott v. Robinson · Watson v. Commissioner · Hogue v. Superior Utilities, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A corporation and a stockholder, even though that stockholder be the owner of the vast majority of the stock, are separate entities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.