Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 N.Y.2d 1077

Fender v. Prescott

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1985

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1985-04-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2016

8 state decisions

1301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

¶2Memorandum.

¶3The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

¶4Execution of a buy-sell agreement between plaintiff and defendant with respect to the stock of National Cold Storage Co., *1079Inc., did not automatically release defendant from his obligation as a shareholder, officer and director of that close corporation not to co-opt a viable corporate opportunity of which he became aware in such capacities. There being, at least, a triable issue of fact concerning the viability of National’s negotiations for acquisition of Merchant’s Refrigerating Co., defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to that opportunity was properly denied.

¶5Summary judgment was also properly denied defendant as to his acquisition of National Gypsum Company’s Gold Bond Division prior to execution of the buy-sell agreement. That National Cold Storage engaged in purchasing and operating cold storage facilities did not preclude its entry into other fields and the affidavits establish that it negotiated for acquisition of businesses widely diverse from cold storage. There are, therefore, triable issues of fact as to that acquisition as well.

¶6Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur in memorandum.

¶7Order affirmed, etc.

/64/ny2d/1077 · .json · Public domain