Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Ohio App. 2d 105 - State v. Sutton

64 Ohio App. 2d 105 - State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably 14 Ohio App. 3d 396 - State v. Dixon (1984), 86 Ohio App. 3d 810 - State v. Today's Bookstore, Inc. (1993)

62 state decisions

220197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · United States v. Dionisio · 44 Ohio App. 2d 130 - State v. Olderman · Coleman v. State · State v. Van Ness

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Crim.R. 48(B) does not provide for a dismissal with prejudice; the court has the inherent power to dismiss with prejudice only where it is apparent that the defendant has been denied a constitutional or statutory right, the violation of which would, in itself, bar prosecution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of Crim.R. 48 is to maintain a defendant's right to a speedy trial, but the rule does not alter the pre-rule Ohio practice concerning the court's inherent power to dismiss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “While a hearing in chambers will, in our judgment, satisfy the open court requirement of both the rule and the statute, the lack of a hearing runs afoul of both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.