Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Ohio App. 2d 165 - State v. Ferguson

64 Ohio App. 2d 165 - State v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Arrington · 49 Ohio App. 2d 268 - State v. Haag · State v. Thacker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is possible error and there is denial of due process when a transcript is available but the trial court refuses to furnish it to the defense. In the instant case, however, any prejudice to appellant was also prejudice to the prosecution. Both sides were deprived of a transcript. A clear distinction can be made between Arrington, supra, and the instant case. In Arrington , the prosecutor had a copy of the preliminary hearing transcript while the defendant did not. The instant case is more like Ferguson, supra, where neither side had a copy of the transcript. {¶ 21} "In the instant case, the court did everything possible to correct the harm that may have accrued to the appellant because there was no transcript of a preliminary hearing. The trial court granted a preliminary hearing in the common pleas court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.