64 Ohio App. 2d 203 - State v. Papp’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Maurer (1984), State v. Loza (1994)
59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Brewer v. Williams · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Nardone v. United States · Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In general terms, the conduct of a prosecuting attorney during trial cannot be made a ground of error unless that conduct deprives the defendant of a fair trial.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“`We have no quarrel with, and no citation of authority is required to support, the Defendant's contention that evidence obtained in violation of one's Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights must be excluded from evidence. It likewise follows that all evidence obtained as a result of such illegal activity the "fruit of the poisonous tree" must likewise be excluded.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bainbridge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.