64 Ohio App. 3d 296 - Hodge v. Cheek’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers · Beatty v. Akron City Hospital · Denicola v. Providence Hospital · State ex rel. Specht v. Oregon City Board of Education · 2 Ohio App. 3d 347 - Gates v. Brewer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) A municipal court, county court, or court of common pleas, or the court of claims, shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action upon a medical, dental, optometric, or chiropractic claim only if the complaint or other pleading that sets forth the claim is supported by documentation as required by and described in division (C) of this section. "(C)(1) The complaint or other pleading that sets forth a medical, dental, optometric, or chiropractic claim shall be accompanied by one of the following types of supporting documentation: "* * * "(c) An affidavit of the claimant's attorney or, if the claimant is not represented by an attorney, of the claimant that states that the claimant or the claimant's attorney has submitted a written request to the defendant in question for an examination of or the copying of the medical, dental, optometric, or chiropractic records of the claimant or, if different, the patient involved and that the defendant in question has failed to produce those records within sixty days after receipt of that request.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.