Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Ohio App. 3d 626 - State v. Ruegsegger

64 Ohio App. 3d 626 - State v. Ruegsegger’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 57 Ohio App. 3d 144 - State v. Hall · 4 Ohio App. 3d 7 - City of Columbus v. Sullivan · 17 Ohio App. 3d 182 - State v. Ulrich · In re Miera · 516 So. 2d 800 - Bickerstaff v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An in limine order is generally not a pretrial motion preserved under Crim.R. 12(H) because it is not `[a] defense, objection, or request which is capable of determination without the trial of the general issue.' * * * Accordingly, a no contest plea waives asserted error to a ruling in limine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.