Huth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2016
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moss v. Dept. of Natural Resources
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“outlet and plaintiff's husband was electrocuted while connecting the electric hook-up. The Ohio Supreme Court determined that the plaintiff was not a recreational user because the fee paid to enter and use the trailer site and its facilities was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A person is not a 'recreational user,' as defined in R.C. 1533.18(B), if he pays a fee or consideration to enter upon 'premises' to engage in recreational pursuits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Forman v. Kreps“charge necessary to utilize the overall benefits of a recreational area * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.