Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 OHIOST2D 322 - Ohio v. Madison

Ohio v. Madison’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Jester (1987), State v. Self (1990)

84 state decisions

40019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evaluating the likelihood of misidentification include the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness' degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness' prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no prohibition against a viewing of a suspect alone in what is called a `one-man showup' when this occurs near the time of the alleged criminal act; such a course does not tend to bring about misidentification but rather tends under some circumstances to insure accuracy.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether, based on the totality of the circumstances, there is a very substantial likelihood of misidentification.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.