State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 166 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 169 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Taylor (1997), State v. Skatzes (2004)
3 federal appellate · 166 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Bradley · State v. Dehass · State v. Lott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plea preserves his right to object to the alleged insufficiency of the evidence. Id. Moreover, because”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“An appellate court's function when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is to examine the evidence admitted at trial to determine whether such evidence, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“as used in R.C. 2921.41(C)(1) includes both the guilt determination and the imposition of sentence. In Henderson, at paragraphs one and two of the syllabus, we held that a defendant who has pled guilty but is awaiting sentencing for a theft offense has not been previously convicted of a theft offense within the meaning of R.C. 2 January Term, 1994 2913.02(B), and that in order to constitute a prior theft conviction, there must be a judgment of conviction, as defined in Crim.R. 32(B), for the prior offense. Crim.R. 32(B) provides that a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.