Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 Okla. Crim. 104 - Gerner v. State

64 Okla. Crim. 104 - Gerner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1953
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 63 Okla. Crim. 84 - Chesser v. State · 18 Okla. Crim. 480 - Cheeves v. State · 59 Okla. Crim. 318 - McDonald v. State · 7 Okla. Crim. 322 - Davis v. State · 1 Okla. Crim. 275 - Slater v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the provisions of section 20, art. 7, of the State Constitution, a defendant in a felony ease may waive the right to have the facts determined by a jury, and they may be submitted to the judge. In such case, the finding of the judge upon the facts shall have the force and effect of a verdict by a jury. “The credibility of the testimony of defendant and his witnesses, where a jury^is waived, is for the trial court to determine and, although such testimony may^be uncontradicted and not directly impeached, when circumstances tend to lessen the probability that such testimony is true, the trial court may give it such -weight as he may deem proper, or wholly disregard it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.