64 Or. App. 183 - State v. Clevenger’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"This court is not authorized to consider on direct appeal defendant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to withdraw his pleas. ORS 138.050; State v. Lugo, 48 Or App 919 , 618 P2d 986 (1980); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532 , 475 P2d 421 (1970). Only matters relating to the sentence may be considered unless, as a matter of law, there has been no valid guilty plea under ORS 135.380(2) and, therefore, no conviction. State v. Reichert, 39 Or App 905 , 593 P2d 1298 (1979). If defendant has a remedy, it is under the Post Conviction Act." (Footnote omitted)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Clevenger