64 Or. App. 532 - State v. Horine’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “. . . the same exercise of judgment that takes place when an attorney finds one arguable issue to raise and determines that there are no other non-frivolous issues presented by the case; we see no constitutional distinction between those situations.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. In Re Kayla G.

2. “The indigent appellant certainly has the same right to present an appeal as one who is not indigent, but it is not clear why an indigent should have a right to a more comprehensive appeal process than a non-indigent.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. In Re Kayla G.

3. “When [the] attorney has reviewed the law and the record as an advocate and determines that there are no non-frivolous issues to be raised on appeal, the appellant has received what is constitutionally required.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 137 Wis. 2d 90 - State Ex Rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals