Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 S.D. 161

In re Hosford

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1936

South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1936-03-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2021

1 state decisions

Relies on In Re Hosford

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM..

¶1The above-entitled applicant, having been disbarred from the practice of law by previous opinion of this court (In re Hosford, 62 S. D. 374, 252 N. W. 843), has made application for reinstatement; the Attorney General of this state appearing in opposition thereto. Applicant appeared in person and by counsel, and the matter has been fully submitted! to, and considered by, the court. Prom the petition and facts presented in support thereof when considered with the previous record of the applicant, the same are deemed insufficient to warrant his reinstatement. The judges are of the opinion, therefore, that saidl application should be denied.

Hon. H. R. HAN'UBY, the Judge of the Seventh Circuit, and Hon. FRANK R. FISHER, one of the Judges of the Ninth Circuit, sitting in place of Judges POULEY and' ROBERTS, disqualified.
/64/sd/161 · .json · Public domain