Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Welsh’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2007
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Field v. Clark · Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. Lewis · Sherman v. Story · Spangler v. Jacoby · Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of Oxford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“question upon the final passage shall be taken upon its last reading, and the yeas and nays shall be entered upon the journal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The presiding officer of each house shall, in the presence of the house over which he presides, sign all bills and joint resolutions passed by the legislature, after their titles have been publicly read immediately before signing, and the fact of signing shall be entered upon the journal."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Each house shall keep a journal of its proceedings and publish the same from time to time, except such parts as require secrecy, and the yeas and nays of members on any question shall be taken at the desire of one-sixth of those present and entered upon the journal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.