Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 So. 2d 536 - Boynton v. State

64 So. 2d 536 - Boynton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably 596 So. 2d 957 - Traylor v. State (1992), 245 So. 2d 225 - State v. Ashby (1971)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

100195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 19 U.S.C. § 535

Relies on Boyd v. United States · 46 So. 2d 871 - Dunnavant v. State · Thurman v. State · City of Jacksonville v. Wilson · County of Okeechobee v. Fla. Natl. Bank of Jax

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Every particular section of the Declaration of Rights stands on an equal footing with every other section. They recognize no distinction between citizens. Under them every citizen, the good and the bad, the just and the unjust, the rich and the poor, the saint and the sinner, the believer and the infidel, have equal rights before the law. It is just as much a violation of the Constitution to deny a person the right to worship in accordance with the dictates of his conscience, to suppress the freedom of speech or of the press, or to deny a trial by jury, as it is to violate his right to be secure in his person, house, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures * * *."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The words ‘place of business’ as used in Beverage Law requiring that liquor licensee agree that his place of business shall be subject to search without search warrant means the licensed premises and includes not only the rooms where liquors are stored or sold by [the] licensee, but also all other rooms in the building which are so closely connected therewith as to admit of free passage from drink parlor to other rooms, provided licensee has some dominion or control over, or right to use, such other rooms.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches, shall not be violated and no warrants issued, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place or places to be searched and the person or persons, and thing or things to be seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.