64 So. 3d 1232 - Corona v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Davis v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that a defendant intone special 'magical words' in order to preserve a Sixth Amendment Crawford 4 claim, the defendant must be "sufficiently specific to inform the court of the perceived error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rivera v. State“In order for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rivera v. State“Violations of the Confrontation Clause, where preserved, are subject to harmless error analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Malave v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.