Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 SO3D 139 - Austin v. State

Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 25 So. 3d 691 - Lucky v. State · Fritts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Electrical components like televisions, computers, and stereo systems are subject to accelerated obsolescence because manufacturers are constantly releasing new, improved technology at lower prices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it would cost at least $500 or $600 to get a new laptop computer with the same programs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.