Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 So. 3d 36 - Flomer v. Farthing

64 So. 3d 36 - Flomer v. Farthing’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 550 So. 2d 986 - Ex Parte Bayliss · 514 So. 2d 877 - Gaston v. Ames · Stack v. Stack · Vainrib v. Downey · Kent v. Kent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is the law in Alabama that testimony about payment of money is competent, and the fact that there may be written records goes to the probative value of such testimony, not its competency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “was free to accept the daughter's testimony about her average book expenses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “provide sufficient proof of those expenses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.