64 So. 3d 542 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 660 So. 2d 1228 - Davis v. State · 737 So. 2d 322 - Puckett v. State · 784 So. 2d 186 - Austin v. State · 540 So. 2d 1 - Wright v. State · 312 So. 2d 702 - Edmond v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Jury instructions are to be read together and taken as a whole with no one instruction taken out of context. A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions given which present his theory of the case[;] however, this entitlement is limited in that the court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.