Ames v. Ames’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. Wright · 47 Tex. Civ. App. 391 - Turner v. Turner · Uhl v. Irwin · 42 Tex. Civ. App. 391 - St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Easley, McAdams & Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.