Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 TEX 589 - Buchanan v. Bilger

Buchanan v. Bilger’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
October 1969
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 1969 · most notably Jirou v. Jirou (1910), Halbrook v. Quinn (1924)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

120188518901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““During the pendency of an administration in the county court, that court has entire supervision of the estate, and is armed with full powers to protect the interests of heirs, legatees and creditors. These are authorized to come into that court and object to any irregularities or improper conduct of the administrator in tjie execution of his trust; to have his accounts scrutinized and revised by the judge, and the administrator himself removed if necessary; and if the county court makes incorrect irulings in prejudice of their rights, to have them corrected on appeal to the district court. . It is only after an administrator has been discharged from his trust in some manner recognized by law that an original suit can be prosecuted upon his bond in the district court to make him and his sureties respond in damages for a waste and misappropriation of the assets of the estate. The extent of this waste cannot be known until the administrator has ceased to manage the estate, for not until then can it be ascertained in what manner and to what extent he will account to the county court for the assets committed to his charge.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is now the well-settled doctrine of this court that the district court has no original jurisdiction to revise and correct the proceedings, orders, and decrees of a county court sitting in matters of probate. Its jurisdiction in this respect is entirely appellate, and to be exercised by means of an appeal or writ of certiorari, as provided in the Revised Statutes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.