Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 64 U.S. 484 - Thomas Green v. William Custard

Thomas Green v. William Custard’s Empirical Analysis

64 U.S. 484 · 1859

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 1960
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1960 · most notably Goldey v. Morning News (1895), Claflin v. Commonwealth Insurance (1884)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

150185918601870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John Gordon v. James Longest · Pollard and Pickett v. Dwight et al. · Spinning v. Drake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If Green had been a citizen of Texas, and Custard had claimed a right as indorsee of a citizen of Texas to bring his suit in the courts of the United States, because he (Custard) was a citizen of another State, the case would have occurred which is included in the proviso to the 11th section of the act, which restrains the jurisdiction of the court. But the United States court had jurisdiction of this case by virtue of the 12th section. It is a right plainly conferred on Green, a citizen of Massachusetts, when sued by a citizen of Texas in a State court of Texas, no matter what the cause of action may be, provided it demand over five hundred dollars. The exception of the 11th section could have no possible application to the ease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.